Community-Wealth.org Join our community...
 
 
 
Strategies & Models: The C-W Access Panel (back to panel)

Program Related Investments

Overview  \  Support Organizations  \  Models & Best Practices
Research Resources  \  Articles-Publications


OVERVIEW

Foundations use many tools to spur community wealth building. Grant-based initiatives are one prominent strategy. Here, however, we focus on program-related investments. Program-related investments, also known as PRIs, leverage limited foundation dollars—most often by providing long-term, low-interest loans—to promote community wealth building and other mission-related foundation goals.

The Ford Foundation, one of the first to use PRIs, began its program in 1968. According to a 1974 review of its first five years, even after accounting for loan losses, administrative costs, and the opportunity cost inherent in providing money at a below-market rate of interest, Ford found that “$1 million invested in a PRI is the equivalent of $5 million in grant expenditures.” Since then, the use of PRIs has grown steadily. In 2003, the top five PRI providers were the David & Lucile Packard Foundation, followed by Ford, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the F. B. Heron Foundation, and the Otto Bremer Foundation.

The most recent survey, conducted in 2001 by The Foundation Center, found that foundations provided a total of $232.9 million in program-related investments. Although modest (the amount was slightly under 1% of the amount of grants disbursed), these PRIs leverage over $1 billion a year, a not inconsiderable sum.

Their importance is even greater than their numbers, as PRIs are a leading practical example of a growing trend of “double bottom line” investing (i.e., investing that seeks a blended financial and social return). According to a 2002 study conducted on behalf of the Rockefeller Foundation, as much of 75% of actual “double bottom-line” investing in the United States can be said to take the form of PRIs.

At present, most foundations allocate just over the legally mandated 5% minimum of assets to mission-related activity. Many are now calling on foundations to place some of the 95% of their remaining assets in double bottom-line investing. The Heron Foundation has been a leader in this area, investing 20% of its assets in grants, PRIs, and other forms of social investment as of July 2005.

The effects of PRIs on community wealth building have been substantial, helping support the growth to scale of community development corporations (CDCs) and community development financial institutions (CDFIs). The long-term, low-interest financing that PRIs provide has enabled CDCs and CDFIs to leverage significantly greater private funding. To take one prominent example, the Living Cities program (which has supported over 200 CDCs in 23 cities over the past decade) used roughly $150 million in foundation PRIs and corporate support in the early 1990s to leverage $750 million in community development investment.


STRATEGIES & MODELS...
» Access Panel
» Search by Location
» Directory
» CW Toolbox
» CW Roundtables
» CW Cities
» CW Interviews
 
» Site Map

ACCESS PANEL SECTORS
» CDCs
» CDFIs
» CLTs
» Co-ops
» Cross-Sectoral
» ESOPs
» Green Collar Jobs *NEW*
» Individual Wealth Building
» Outside the U.S.
» Program Related Investments
» Reclaiming the Commons
» Social Enterprise
» Socially Responsible Investing
» Municipal Enterprise
» New State & Local Policies
» State Asset Building Initiatives
» State & Local Investments
» Transit-Oriented Development
» Anchor Institutions
» University Partnership
 
 
   Home  \  About C-W  \  Strategies & Models  \  News & Events  \  Articles & Publications  \  C-W Blog  \  Contact Us  \  Site Map